Direct Democracy Catalysed by Resident-to-Resident Online Deliberation
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the context of local civic governance, much of the interest in eParticipation concerns the extent to which online media might overcome the limitations of geography and scale, and so allow local interests to be better represented in institutionally driven participatory processes at national or regional level. In contrast, this study investigates the online deliberations of a local, geographically bounded community in a series of mailing lists that had originated from their own initiative and self-organisation. The interactions we observe challenges assumptions of democratic deliberation as mainly policy debate between citizens and government, or of lobbying administrative government. It also proposes a broader conception of the role of online deliberation in local governance, where instrumental decision-making and developing consensus is frequently over privileged in research.
منابع مشابه
The Open University ’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs Direct Deliberative Governance Online : Consensual Problem Solving or Accommodated Pluralism ?
Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online's data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. Abstract This paper describes and analyses patterns of 'governance conversation' observed in interactions on email lists that aim to support local, direct ...
متن کاملDirect Deliberative Governance and the Web: The Collaborative Work of Democratic Decision-Making Mediated by an Online Social Environment
Abstract Direct deliberative democracy presents a conceptually attractive model of civic governance – particularly relevant at local scale. We outline the ‘work’ of direct deliberative democracy by considering its underlying principles and objectives, and discuss four fundamental challenges that are commonly proposed: the difficulty of coordinating direct participation, the expertise required o...
متن کاملThe Role of Online Deliberation on Citizens’ Attitudes
In this paper, an experiment was conducted to assess the impact of online deliberation on citizens’ attitudes. Specifically, this research compared pre and post deliberation opinions of participants who deliberated online via an asynchronous platform regarding the issue of political opinion polls. Results indicate that online deliberation had a positive effect on citizens’ attitudes since it wa...
متن کاملA case-based approach for teaching professionalism to residents with online discussions
Introduction: Programs must demonstrate that their residentsare taught and assessed in professionalism. Most programsstruggle with finding viable ways to teach and assess this criticalcompetency. UTHSCSA Family and Community MedicineResidency developed an innovative option for interactive learningand assessment of residents in this competency which would betransferrable to other programs and sp...
متن کاملParticipatory or deliberative democracy? Exploring the mediation effects of perceived online deliberation and online interactive activities on social outcomes
Using the structural equation modeling method (N = 811), this study explores the structural relationships among online news consumption, political participation and social trust, with a focus on the mediating effects of online users' deliberative perceptions and news-related online interactive activities. The analysis confirms that users' perceptions of online deliberation exert a significant m...
متن کامل